Showing posts with label January 2011 Revolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label January 2011 Revolution. Show all posts

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Many things are gone, but not what we hoped for on Feb 11 2011

On a glorious day, I and many others felt the world has changed; that the will of people managed to take down a cancer called Mubarak and his criminal regime of corrupt military, security forces, judiciary and aristocracy.
We truly thought he was gone.  
We truly thought Egypt was ready for a fresh start.

And We were wrong, and wrong big time.   Military Cancer is never gone.

Since then, many other things have gone, though.
Gone was the warm feelings about the country.
Gone was the hope in a fairer future.
But more painfully: GONE was the trust in the intentions and judgment of many people that were once beyond the slightest doubt.

In many ways for me, January 2011 revolution in Egypt is dead, but it has been what I call "an illuminating event".

It was a moment when the 'rubber hit the road'; the moment when it becomes obvious who thinks and acts in the light of guiding principles of equality, freedom and justice for all, and those that do not.
Revolutions may success and revolutions may fail.  And when they fail, it hurts.  
But it is the people's near-collective betrayal of universal principle of conscience that leaves the deepest wound.
 Khaled

Sunday, January 17, 2016

Sit This One Out, Please - for REAL People's Sake

I am not optimistic about any real change on the ground this coming January 25th.  I will be praying for success, but I know the odds are not at all good - pretty slim in fact- and the price to be paid by the REAL revolutionaries will be very high.  But I hope for some success to keep the flame alive for a little longer.

Just please, do not go out if you were one of those that called for and cheered the revolt and military coup against the outcome of of Jan 2011 REVOLUTION.  You mostly are still mincing your words about where you stand, and spending more time finding excuses, rather than doing soul searching where you went wrong.  And,  YOU WERE WRONG.

So, go back to your crying over what is wrong with 'the other countries' than the one country that counts for you, and to your reminiscence over a deluded past that carried nothing good except for select aristocrats, military or royal, or whatever makes you happy with yourself.
Please, for REAL people's sake, sit this 'January Spirit Event' out.  You help KILL the last one anyway.
May God be with this one. 

Sunday, June 3, 2012

Trial of the Century in Egypt botched by the village idiots

You all probably know by now that the so called trial of the century for Mubarak, the deposed president f Egypt, his Minster of Interior, Al-Adly, Mubarak's children and 6 most senior assistants of the Minister of Interiors has ended with a fizzle.
Mubarak and al-Adly received life sentences (that I am certain will be reversed on appeal), and ALL the others got acquitted.

A lot of Egyptians are mad as hell.  Count me one of those for many reasons.  Reading the reasons for judgments (حيثيات الحكم) is enough to get one's blood pressure go through the roof.

I am cutting and pasting here from my facebook comments on the subject with some thoughts and feeling about the trial. So, excuse me if it is coming across choppy.
سماع و قراءة حيثيات الحكم في قضية "القرن" تثير الغثيان. ما هو قدر عدم الكفاءة المطلوب كي تصبح احد اعضاء النيابة الخمسة في اكبر قضية في تاريخ مصر و العالم العربي؟ بيدو ان اي قدر من الكفاءة سيكون من معوقات الحصول علي الوظيفة. أرشح اعضاء النيابة في القضية لجائزة عبيط القرية الاول.
Reading or listening to the Reasons of Judgement in the so-called "Egypt's trial of the Century"  is simply nauseating.  How much ineptness does it take to qualify for a prosecutor's position? It seems clear that any degree of legal proficiency is a great impediment to getting a position as a prosecutor (النيابة).
I know it sounds strange at this time (since all Egypt is mad at the judge), but I kind feel bad for the presiding judge, Rifaat. Without proofs what was he supposed to do? My gut feeling, he took it on his own to give the top 2 accused (Mubarak and Adly) a guilty verdict with life sentence because he simply could not let them go. It was distasteful by all moral standards to let them go.  He just could not stomach it, even though he was not provided with any material proof. If the evidence is as meager as was seen on TV during some of the last few public sessions and as per his ruling statements, he probably would have had to give them all innocent verdict if he wanted to be legally in the clear.
For those non-Arabic speakers who followed the so-called "trial of the century" of Mubarak and his security assistants, but could not read the reason of verdict, here it is: 

The reasons for judgement provided by the judge for acquitting the 6 most senior assistance of the minister if interiors included the following: no material evidence linking would of the dead and injured to the weapons of the police, no evidence of communication (wired or wireless) between the acquitted leaders and their troops re the actions taken, no reliable weapons, ammunition or recovered bullets linking any police weapons to injuries (in a case that included including charges for the death of 850 Egyptians and injuring/assaulting 7000 others over 17 days of assault on the unarmed demonstrators, the prosecutors presented 4 guns and about 10 bullets in total). 
Prosecution witnesses were all deemed unreliable with past history perjury for some and previous media releases of suspicious nature for others.
The village idiots (playing the role of the prosecution) also filed the abuse of power and embezzlement charges against the children of Mubarak AFTER the statute of limitations has expired.  They actually chose - of all the corruption charges possible against Mubarak and his family after 30 years in power - to present a charge that has expired.  an no one notice that over the 10 month trial till the verdict was released less than 24 hours ago 
Prosecutors positions in Egypt are some of the most privileged and prestigious positions in the government.  It secures a life-long guaranteed career of financial comfort in a position of power, total immunity from nearly anything, and and easy access to a judge positions after few years.  As you would have imagined, they were exclusively filled with the children of the rich and powerful, especially in the higher-ups in the military, police and judiciary. Moreover, Law school of Egypt is not like hear: it takes the BOTTOM tier of students, so we are not starting with the creme de la creme anyway.
And I have to finish in a lighter note, otherwise I will have to bang my head into the wall.

And the Village Idiots prize of the Century goes to... the 5 members of the Egyptian prosecution in the trial of the century.
Egyptians are expecting to have many more days and months of turmoil. Tens of thousands are back into the Tahrir square. I do not know how much more blood would be shed before they start getting any breaks.
May God help us all.
Khaled





Thursday, March 17, 2011

Shari'a in Egypt's Constitution: Leave it there or Take it out?

One of the problematic issues about the Egyptian constitution, currently under renovation, is Article No. 2, stating that the "principles of Islamic Shari'a are the principal source of legislation" in Egypt.
The article was introduced in the constitution few decades ago, during the time Sadat was appeasing the rightwing religious group in an attempt to stifle liberal secular groups, particularly leftist 'Nasserites' who continued to believe in the economic and pan-Arab policies of Nasser, Egypt's previous president.  Sadat's efforts were part of his attempt to look western-leaning, as he distanced himself from the Soviet Union.

Egypt's population is about 90% Muslim- an overwhelming majority.  From a practical point of view, Article No.2 was very unlikely to add much to the Islamic tendencies in legislations if the Muslim population elected to implement Islam inspired laws.  But since elections and the Egyptian parliament were a joke during the time of Sadat and Mubarak, the article practically meant absolutely nothing.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

My tears are flowing again

The last 3 weeks have been more emotional than anyone can imagine.  I do not think I had cried in my whole life than I did the last few weeks, with all that was going in Egypt.  And the tears continued out of joy off and on since then, especially thinking of the those who lost their blood so that the rest of their fellow Egyptians can feel the pride of the rebirth of the Egyptian nation.

I had a break from uncontrollable tearing for a couple of days until a friend, an Egyptian American Jesuit priest,  posted this video on his Facebook page.
I could not stop tearing.
It is just a video - no word, just cheers of joy by the people on the street, and cars honking as the Egyptian flag stretched between the Church of the Saints in Alexandria (and the seen of bloody suicide bombing on New Years Eve), and the Mosque across the street form it.
-------------


Please, pray with me that the spirit of that great nation and all the goodness in its peoples hearts will last forever.

Khaled

Friday, February 11, 2011

Now it is official.

Thanks to Slama, fellow Egyptian blogger.  She checked the Wikipedia entry on Egypt's ex, and it has been changed.
Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak (Arabic: محمد حسني سيد مبارك‎, Egyptian Arabic pronunciation: [mæˈħæmːæd ˈħosni ˈsæjːed moˈbɑːɾɑk], Muḥammad Ḥusnī Sayyid Mubārak; born May 4, 1928[1]) was the fourth President of Egypt from 1981 to 2011.
.......On February 11, 2011, Vice President Omar Suleiman announced that Mubarak had resigned as President of Egypt, transferring authority to the Higher Council of the Armed Forces, following 18 days of protests challenging his thirty-year rule.[5][6]
 Nothing that anyone does not know by now.
I just wanted to freeze this moment, and highlight the Past tense of his status.

"فَالْيَوْمَ نُنَجِّيكَ بِبَدَنِكَ لِتَكُونَ لِمَنْ خَلْفَكَ آيَةً وَإِنَّ كَثِيرًا مِّنَ النَّاسِ عَنْ آيَاتِنَا لَغَافِلُونَ"
 [Nay,] but today We shall save only thy body, so that thou mayest be a [warning] sign unto those who will come after thee: for, behold, a good many people are heedless of Our messages!" (Quran 10:92)

This is what the Quran said about the Pharaoh.

How befitting!

Khaled 






He is gone

Thursday, February 10, 2011

It seems the momentum is building to cross the finish line

Today may be THE DAY for EGYPT

Twenty minutes ago the supreme council of the armed forces declared:
"Declaration Number 1: The council is in permanent session to see what need to be done to protect the country AND the gains and the ambitions of Egypt's people."
I cannot wait for Declaration #2.

Khaled

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Change For Egypt: A re-post from Salma's Blog

This a great post by Sala, the young Egyptian blogger I mentioned several times before.  I like the way she writes. And the way she expresses her thoughts are very moving.  She, gracefully, gave me permission to re-post her latest blog entry.

-------- (Salma's post followes) --------

Change for Egypt..

I do not even know how to start this post..i am over-whelmed by all the love i am seeing from Egyptians towards their country...

I was recently thinking of what may happen if Mubarak decided to leave this minute..will people just go home and wait for elections...and the next morning will be just another day that the sun rises upon where education is poor, pollution fills the land and air, an economy that has just fell apart..and the same people who have corruption for a culture because of the many years that they have been soaked in lies...
Just as this thought was lingering in my mind, i was added to a group on Facebook with the name "Misr 2020" ...
Young people who decided to make real change in this country post-protests...making plans to change people because the protests were only the wind that blew away the rotten system, but what about the rotted minds of children who got little or no education, rotted consciences of people who are used to bribes and "wasayet" in any of their daily transactions because thats the way they got it the past 30 years (which is to some people, their whole lives)...Ideas on this group are starting to pour in, things like introducing JCIMUN (Junior Cairo International Model United Nations) or any of the other extra-curricular activities which builds awareness and personality..or sweeping the streets of Cairo and picking up the garbage from them...or making awareness campings to fight the corruption within every structure in the society, whether the political, educational, social, or economic structure...As i was browsing this group in astonishment, i was invited to an event, that calls for Egyptians to invest in the stock market to save our economy..then groups and invitations started pouring in on me...i really was awe-inspired..

World, Egyptians are not going to quit until they rise with their country to the status it deserves..
As everyone was giving up on the people of this country, we have proven that we deserve so much better, that we refuse to be led as cattle, and that we could revive Egypt's greatness..
Once again, may God bless our great country and its great people...
--------- ( End of Salma's post)--------

Keep an eye on her blog.  She is worth following.  I only hope she writes more often.

Khaled

The first song written for the Revolution in Egypt

Salma, a young Egyptian blogger and frequent commenter on this forum has provided me with a link to what possibly could be the first song written specifically for the January 25 revolution.

It has a great beat, beautiful lyrics, and the video is pretty moving.  It is sung by Mouhammad Mounir, a well know and respected Egyptian singer.

Thanks so much Salma for the link.  I am sure more and more songs with be coming out, and I pray that we will remember all of them joyously in the future when we reminisce over and relish every moment we are living these days, and its success that we should all be praying for all the time.



Khaled

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Corrupt Clergy serving their 'human' Masters: A safer bet as God forgives, Mubarak does not.

Al-Tayyeb: Al-Azhar Senior sheikh
The most senior Al-Azhar clergy, Ahmad Al-Tayyeb criticizes Iran's clergy for making [political] statements, using their 'religious authority'; statements which, in his opinions, contradicts the explicit statements of Quran and Prophetic teachings as well as the 'consensus' of the Muslim nation.
That usually means that Iranians made statements along the lines: "Demonstrators good - Mubarak bad"!
Of course, when Al-Tayyeb makes statements along the line of "Mubarak good - demonstrators bad", that is a totally different thing.
The pot calling the kettle ........

Moreover, if one knows 'the explicit statements of the Quran' they would knows that Al-Tayyeb either lies with out shame, or he is not fully aware of the content of the Quran.

And, one more thing: What consensus??? If Iran Clergy had a different opinion (be it right or wrong), that means there is no 'Islamic' consensus on the issue. If their opinion does not count, they are not an authority.  So, I am not sure what his point is.

I guess, Al-Tayyeb expertise is more in 'how to serve one's masters till the last breath, and not in Quranic studies or logic.

Egypt's Grand Mufti: Ali Jum'a
And, not to be outdone, Egypt's Mufti, Ali Jum'a issues an opinion that democracy and protests are OK 'as long as they do not interrupt peoples lives, and not add to unemployment!'.  But when it comes to his master's ruling Egypt for 30 years while the country went downhill, with rampant poverty, vanishing infrastructure, and unemployment (direct and indirect) estimated to be aver 40%; the 'grand' Mufti had no opinion on that.

There are many Egyptian sayings to describe people like those clergy, some are beneath my standards, even when I am as angry as I am, but a milder one would be: "Feed the mouth, and their eyes would not dare look critically at you أطعم الفم , تستحي العين ".  I guess Mubarak feeds them well.

Saudi Mufti
Saudi Arabia Mufti, of course, had to have some input as well, but I generally would not care to comments on Saudi Arabia religious edicts, unless they are comical, which happens a lot.  This one unfortunately, is plain stupid, and not funny.  So, just take my words for it: it is as stupid as the opinions of his Egyptian counter parts.  Additionally, it makes sure that the word 'Fitna' (popular word for the conservative Muslim demagogues) is thrown in, associated with the word 'demonstrations', which he describes as  Haram, i.e., religiously forbidden by divine commandments!!!! (See links below in Arabic).

Some men of God these ones are!

Khaled


Links:
Past relevant blog posts:

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Great idea for Egypt: sub-lease Mubarak to the idiots that admire him.

Mubarak as most Egyptians see him
I am baffled: Democracy is supposed to bring good elements (with, hopefully average IQ at least) to government.  But, if that is the case how would idiots like Biden, Blair and Berlusconi made it?

According to them Mubarak is (1) not a dictator, and not only (2) a courageous man, but apparently (3) a very wise one too.

Those darn Egyptian ingrates!  They do not appreciate the jewel they have.  Mubarak deserves a different kind of people.  He sacrifices 30 years of his life ruling them, yet they do not appreciate it.

Mubarak in his wise man look
Oh, Wait a second: I just had a brilliant idea: how about sending him for an additional 6 year term of non-dictatorial, courageous and wise leadership in each of the lovely countries of US, UK and whatever the hell Berlusconi leads.
(Note: I used to think Berlusconi was leading Italy, but I cannot imagine Italians are that dumb to elect him in the first place, and them re-elect him.  So, I must be wrong about that!).

So, remember that you heard about it first on my blog: Egypt should franchised it wise guy to any one that admires him.  They will do it for free.  Any takers?
Khaled

Links:

Friday, February 4, 2011

It is time for a personal note

Since I have started blogging, I do not recall that I have talked about anything very personal. But with all the amazing events unfolding in Egypt at the hands of the millions of the brave and beautiful Egyptian men and women of all ages, religions, social classes and education levels, it has been difficult to hold back from expressing some personal emotions that have been recurring on my mind for the last 3 days.

I have lived most of my life in Egypt in my parents house about half a mile from Tahrir (Liberation) square. It was the center of my activities, going and coming from middle and high schools.  It was where I met my closest friends every weekend for a decade to sit at one of the cafes there to talk about every thing: politics, physics, medicine, religion, the future of our nation and everything else in life.

It was the place I passed by  as I walked or drove to medical school and to our social and sporting club.  It was the place where we met on days when friends got together to go on a picnic or to the movies.  

I was even born in a hospital about a mile from the Tahrir square on the western side of the Nile, across from the Tahrir Square.  And, very likely, my parents drove through Tahrir square with me when I was one day old to go back home.

Today, a revolution reshaping the face and future of Egypt is happening very close to where I spent most of my days and nights in Egypt, and all I can do is watch it on TV or online.  The fact that I am not there with them is shaking me so hard.

I am fantasizing about being there now.  I have never regretted leaving Egypt and I have built a good life in my new adopted country.  But last week's events will keep me asking myself: Should I have stayed there to be part of those glorious events?

I know one thing: If I were in Cairo last week, I would have spent every moment of my day and night at Tahrir square.  Last night, while journalists were interviewing some of the brave Egyptians holding there positions in Tahrir Square in the face of the security forces thugs: the sound of repeated gunfire filled the background.  Every shot I heard shook me as if I were there, and I wished in my heart to have been there taking the chance with them on my birth land and its future.

None of those who were killed or injured was more deserving of death or injury than I do. None of their families deserved to suffer the pain, anxiety and the sense of loss than my family does.

I know for sure that my father and my mother would have not for a second doubted that I should be there. For them, that would have been the place to be, no matter how big the risk was.

I know also one more thing for sure.  My father passed away 5 years ago at the age of 80 years.  If he were alive today, he would have been there with the revolutionaries, possibly to be the oldest amongst them. It was the dream of his life to see Egypt become what it should be - a dream that the revolution is bringing closer everyday.

He would  have loved to take a bullet instead of one of the young heroes.  He would have loved to die there. He would have died on the happiest day of his life.

Khaled 

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Egyptian Christians: some voice of the People on the BBC

وفقا لرفيق وهو أحد الأقباط في مصر بأن أسطورة اعتبار الرئيس حسني مبارك أفضل مدافع عن المسيحيين في مواجهة المتشددين الإسلاميين تحطمت مع وقوع تفجير كنيسة القديسين في الاسكندرية عشية العام الجديد.
وواصل رفيق وأقباط اخرون التظاهر إلى جانب مليون مصري على الأقل خرجوا يوم الثلاثاء مؤكدين أن رغبتهم في إنهاء حكم مبارك المستمر منذ 30 عاما أكثر الحاحا من أي مخاوف بوقوع تغيير في السلطة يصب لصالح الجماعات الإسلامية. 
".. According to Rafiq, an Egyptian Copt, the myth that President Hosni Mubarak is the best defender of [Egyptian] Christians in the face of Islamic extremists is a myth that has fallen with the bombing of the 'Church of Saints' in Alexandria on new year's eve.
Rafiq and other Copts continue to demonstrate together with at least another million Egyptians that took to the streets on Tuesday affirming that their desire to terminate the 30 year long Mubarak rule, superseded any fears of a change in authority that benefits Islamic groups."
ويقول محللون إن مبارك الذي خاضت حكومته مواجهات شرسة أمام المتطرفين الإسلاميين في التسعينات يقدم نفسه للغرب بوصفه الشخص الأنسب والأكثر أمانا في مواجهة التطرف كما أنه يظهر في صورة المدافع عن الأقباط الذي يقدر عددهم بنحو 10 بالمائة من تعداد سكان البلاد البالغ 80 مليون نسمة.
وعلى الرغم من ذلك انضم المسيحيون الى المتظاهرين الذين تدفقوا إلى شوارع مصر رغم تعليقات من البابا شنودة بابا الاسكندرية وبطريرك الكنيسة المرقسية أشاد فيها بمبارك مع بدء الاحتجاجات.
   "... Christians have joined the protesters pouring into the streets of Egypts despite the statements of Coptic Pope Shnouda's that supported Mubrak as the demonstration broke out." (see my previous post here)

ويقول مينا شحاته وهو قبطي من نجع حمادي التي شهدت مقتل ستة مسيحيين مطلع عام 2010 في اطلاق نار "جئنا الى هنا لنظهر ان كل مصري يجب أن يكون هنا ويريد أن يكون هنا وأنه لا فرق بين المسيحيين والمسلمين ."
  "... Mina Shehata, a Copt form Nag'a Hammadi [in Upper Egypt], where 6 Christians were shot and killed in early 2010, said: We came here to show people that Every Egyptian should be here, and should want to be here.  No difference between Christians and Muslims"
وبين المحتجين في ميدان التحرير تكررت مشاهد صور الهلال يعانق الصليب التي ظهرت بعد تفجير كنيسة الاسكندرية الذي قتل فيه 23 شخصا.

"... Amongst the protesters in Tahreer Square, repeated there were images of the Cross joining the Cross, imahges that became more noticeable after the bombing of the Alexandria Church [on new years eve] where 23 individuals were killed"
وقالت متظاهرة أخرى قبطية "نحن لا نريد مبارك والناس هنا لا يريدونه، المسلمون والمسيحيون لا يريدونه.
"... Another Coptic woman demonstrator said: We do not want Mubarak.  People here do not want him.  Muslims and Christians do not want him."


Read the full report of BBC-Arabic here.

As history keep teaching us: organized religious institutions keep failing their people as the institutions survival become eventually the institutions' raisons d'être. Thank God that people also keep figuring that out.

May God Bless and Protect all the freedom seekers in Egypt.

Khaled 


Other links:

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Coptic Pope is still embracing Mubark warmly. Thank God many Copts don't.

Even at a time when the will of the people of Egypt (Muslims and Christians, religious and secular, men and women) is heard loud and clear allover the world, The Coptic Orthodox Pope Shnouda III is sending greeting and his 'people's' support to the criminal dictator.
The story on the street, on the internet and on TV is telling us that Egyptians Christians are as determined as Egyptian Muslims not to let go until the dictator leave.  Thank God for real Egyptians: all of them.
Here is some of the text of the report:
أعلن بابا الإسكندرية وبطريرك الكرازة المرقسية شنودة الثالث أمس الأحد تأييده للرئيس المصري حسني مبارك، الذي يواجه انتفاضة شعبية تتصاعد وتيرتها يوما بعد يوم.
وقال شنودة الثالث في تصريح للتلفزيون المصري الرسمي "اتصلنا بالرئيس وقلنا له كلنا معك والشعب معك. فليحفظه الله لمصر".
 And in English:
"The Pope of Alexandria Shnouda III announces yesterday [Sunday] his support for the Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak who faces a popular uprising that is escalating on daily basis.
Shnouda III announce in a talk for the government-controlled Egyptian TV that: ... We contacted the President and told him that  we all are with you, the people are with you.  May God keep him for Egypt"
I have one word for the Coptic Pope that places large photo of Mubarak next to his Crucifix:
Shame on you.
Out of respect for my fellow Christian Egyptians who are on the streets risking their lives to save Egypt from the hands of a dictator that their Pope endorses, I would have no further comments, for now.

Khaled

Links:



Previous Posts

Monday, January 31, 2011

Does hating Israel make one Anti-Semitic?

[More linked articles added on February 2, 2011]

From Haartz Newspaper (read the full article here):

Israel urges world to curb criticism of Egypt's Mubarak

Jerusalem seeks to convince its allies that it is in the West's interest to maintain the stability of the Egyptian regime.

By Barak Ravid
Israel called on the United States and a number of European countries over the weekend to curb their criticism of President Hosni Mubarak to preserve stability in the region.

Jerusalem seeks to convince its allies that it is in the West's interest to maintain the stability of the Egyptian regime. The diplomatic measures came after statements in Western capitals implying that the United States and European Union supported Mubarak's ouster.
So, if an Egyptian knows this, and hates Israel, does that make them anti-Semites?

Let me word that differently.

If I were a country that claimed to represent Jews, and I tried to stop others from not-supporting the government that tortured you, killed you children, stole your money and incited sectarian violence within your community, then you hated me: does that make you anti-Semite?

And if protesters who think that Mubarak is an Israeli agent (as they suggest in the photo) are correct, would Mubarak hater be anti-Semitic too?

Can't wait to hear how the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) answers that question, although I have a pretty good idea what their answer would be.

Khaled

Also see:
More recently added articles more Israel Lobby efforts to discredit pro-democracy efforts in Egypt:

Saturday, January 29, 2011

The Revolution Young women of Egypt: an inspiration

A young woman worth a million men. Beautiful words. The beauty of all what is going on is that it is reminiscent of the 1919 revolution in Egypt that shook the British in submitting to people's wishes. Then, like today, women were major player facing the bullets of the British as much as med did. I did not ever guess I will live to see this happen again in Egypt.
Khaled
بنت بمليون راجل




Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Organised Religion: Never fails to disappoint (at least in Egypt)

So far the popular uprising on January 25 has not been  effective in changing government structure or policies.  But it is still a major landmark in the history of political protest in Egypt. The extent of organization, the communication technology involved in managing it, and the definite involvement of may women in it, with and without Islamic head cover, have all been remarkable (the photo to the right borrowed from a blog by young Egyptian woman who is also a good writer).

I pray that the outcome fulfills at least some of the hopes of the Egyptian people, And more importantly, I pray that its success, partial of complete, will inject the Egyptian street with the sense of empowerment and pride that makes future hopes easier to achieve.

But many things have not changed, and unlikely to: the brutal government security forces response, the total lack of coverage by major Egyptian media outlet, the shut-down of communication tools (e.g., Twitter) by the government, the always the disappointing response of the American patron of the Egyptian governments, and more importantly, as the title implies, the response of the clergy: Muslims and Christians.

The Muslim Brotherhood - the largest block of political/activist groups in Egypt - came out with a lukewarm statement that it is under threats by the government, and that it will not 'officially' participate or demand that its followers participate in the events, but that it leaves it to the individual members to decide what to do (الإخوان تؤكد مشاركتها بشكل رمزي في المظاهرات.. والعريان: ماحدث تحرك شعبي 100% | الدستور ).

The government-paid Islamic institutions 'scholars', represented by Al-Azhar University faculty and the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs members, came out with lame statements opposing the events and using ridiculous 'religious arguments' that are not worthy of even second grade student (علماء دين: قتلى المظاهرات ليسوا شهداء ).

The response of 'official Islam' in Egypt is not new or surprising.  But considering the status of Christians in Egypt, and the extreme unhappiness with discrimination, primarily by the government, the Egyptian Churches response was, in my opinion, the worst.  Coptic individuals  and other Christian commentators in Egypt also expressed unhappiness for the Churches official opinion.

Church leadership (Coptic, Catholic and Anglican), as well as key figures in Christian non-religious leadership in Egypt (sadly, including Christian human rights activists!!!!) have issued instructions to Egyptian Christians not to participate in the events of January 25 (out of 'love for Egypt', as per the statement), and to stay home.
[Addendum - Jan 28: Another article in English about the Egyptians church is added to the collection of links below]

The opinion was expressed not only in publicized statement, but in churches as well, as stated in the articles.

The logic that clergy (regardless of religion) used to justify submission to oppressive rulers has not changed for centuries.  And clergy has ALWAYS been a useful tool for oppressors everywhere for centuries: from the Jewish establishment in Jesus time in Jerusalem  to Omayyad and Abbasid dynasties, to the Holy Roman empire in Europe, and all the way to slavery US and Apartheid South Africa, Saudi Arabian monarchy, Iran (and modern day orthodox Jews in occupied Palestine)

I do not expect Liberation Theology to make inroads on the religious scene in Egypt, but less explicit expression of submission to oppressors is not too much to expect from 'men of God',  Check these quotes for a taste of their 'Holy' logic
قال الأنبا أنطونيوس عزيز، مطران الجيزة للأقباط الكاثوليك: نرفض تلك المظاهرات، ولا نقبل الخروج على الحاكم إطلاقاً
Bishop Antonios Aziz, Bishop of Giza province Catholic Copt, said: "We reject these demonstrations. We do not accept rebellion against the ruler, ever."


ويرى الشيخ يوسف البدري عضو المجلس الأعلى للشئون الإسلامية أن الله تعالى نهى عن مثل هذه التصرفات التي سعى إليها الشباب دون وعي منهم، لأن القاعدة الفقهية تقول أي فعل يقود للحرام فهو حرام وبالتالي فإن ما يؤدي إلى هلاك النفس واعتقال الشباب والنساء وسفك الدماء ووقوع القتلي وفساد الممتلكات العامة فهو بالطبع حرام ولايرضى عنه دين. ــ
Sheikh Yusuf AlBadri, member of the Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs opines that God has forbidden such acts that youth, thoughtlessly, are aiming to do.  Because [Islamic] Jurisprudence rules that any deed that leads to wrong doing is Haram [= absolutely religiously forbidden by God].  Thus, what leads to loss of lives, detentions of young men and women, bloodshed, death, and damage to public property is therefore Haram, automatically.  And religion does not condone it".

The thoughtless sheikh 'forgets' to mention that the "bloodshed, death, and detention of young men and women" are committed by the government that he conveniently absolves of responsibility while he dumps the responsibility for the evil on those that are protesting the evil.

Translating more of the so-called religious opinions of those clergy - Muslim and Christian - would raise my blood pressure even further (but readers are welcome to check the articles and translate their favorite quotes as comments).

And I would rather translate a religion-neutral comment by a reader that seems to have dignity, to love liberty and to love his country:

اعتقد ان المسيحين مش هايفرق معاهم الكلام ده , زى ما المسلمين مش هايفرق معاهم كلام الشيوخ اللى طلبوا عدم الاشتراك فى المظاهره لاننا كلنا (مسلمين و مسيحين ) عارفين انه الناس ده من ديول النظام و بتاخد تعليماتها من امن الدوله مش من كتاب ربنا. المصريين فهموا خلاص و عرفوا السكه و ناويين يمشوها للاخرنتقابل فى الشارع ان شاء الله
"I think Christian would not care for those Christian clergy opinion as much as Muslims would not care for Muslim clergy opinions.  We all, Muslims and Christians, know that they are part of the regime.  They get their cues from security apparatus, not from the words of God.  Egyptians finally got it, and they know the way.  and they plan to  go all all the way.  See you on the streets, God willing."
I think that reader is too hopeful.

But it does not cost much to hope, and to pray for hopes to come true.

Khaled

Links (of articles mentioned above and few other relevant articles):

Addendum: Links and quotes added after the initial posting date:
"However, leaders of the Coptic diaspora have welcomed the nationwide protests calling for social, economic and political reform. Michael Mounir, head of the US Copts Association, disapproved of churches calling for non-participation in the protests. He said that protesters’ demands are the same for all Egyptians as they include dissolving parliament and other political and social demands."

Sunday, January 23, 2011

Poison in the honey: Kindness that could kill

In my last posting I talked about the sad events of the suicide bombing of a church on New Year's Eve in Alexandria, Egypt.  I also hinted a little about the complex nature of the 'inter-religious' stresses, and the relationship between the government and the religious institutions (namely Al-Azhar, and the Coptic Church).
The fall-out of the sad events in Egypt 3 weeks ago is still unfolding although it has been to some extent shadowed by widely popular uprising in Tunisia, and the planned protest scheduled on January 25 in Egypt.

Unified people can force any brutal or totalitarian regime to submit to the people.  Unpopular governments can only continue to govern when the people are fractured.  In such case, a government really makes no effort to heal the fractures between the different ethnic and religious groups, and in some cases even promote the fracturing and the rise of tensions between the minority and the majority-  'post-colonial divide and conquer', if you will.

A friend has recently forwarded to me an article that vividly illustrates the thoughtless careless attitude of the government in Egypt regarding what the Egyptian people think, or what could lead to more trouble between the two religious groups there.
The articles title is:
"وزير العدل يوقع قرارا بمنح الموظفين المسيحيين مكافأة خاصة بمناسبة أعياد الميلاد"
And in English: " The [Egyptian] Minister of Justice signs a decree offering a special [monetary] bonus to Christian employees on the Occasion of Coptic church Christmas". (Read the article here)
As I mentioned in my previous post, the Egyptian government has systematically exercised, contributed to and enshrined the discrimination against Christian Egyptians for decades, and has directly or indirectly contributed to the flaring of inter-religious strife in Egypt by condoning anti-Christian rhetoric as well as their reluctance to prosecute anti-Christian discrimination.  Still, every now and then, they throw a bone to the Christians, the intention of which is not always clear.

The vast majority of Egyptians are Muslim (90%-92%).  And poverty is cruel and rampant.  On Islamic religious events (Ramdan, Eid-ul-Fitr or Eid-ul-Adh'ha) the governments decrees 'special financial bonuses to help calm people down).  The bonuses are issued on Islamic events, but the recipients are all Egyptians: Muslims, Christian.  So, the recently announce 'special' bonus to Christian Employees' is most odd even by Egyptian standards.

And at a time when the religious tensions are at a combustive level, what would be the wisdom of giving special treatment to Christians working for one particular government agency?  The financial burden is obviously small, but the emotional repercussions are tremendous.

The massacre against Christian Egyptians in Alexandria has triggered a lot of true positive expressions of care, sympathy and soul searching from many Egyptian Muslims towards their Christian compatriots - potentially helping to heal some of the rift between the two groups.  Also, the success of popular up-rise in Tunisia against an oppressive regime could help unite the Egyptian in a dream of similar event.  Given these facts, and in view of a planned mass protest against the Egyptian governments on January 25,   it seems that appeasing Christians by the governments cannot be seen in a light of 'good intention'.

Egyptian governments are not known to be efficient or savvy except when it comes to their own survival.  And, at time of wide spread poverty, it is hard to see why a poor Muslim would see the government financially favoring a group of Christians in a way that would help heal the inflamed religious emotions.
I do not know how the Coptic Church leadership will respond to that weird gesture and appeasement.

The Coptic Church is one of the most politically clever organizations in Egypt having had to learn how to walk a fine line for decades.  I hope they react appropriately, although at times it also has appeased the rulers in Egypt – who lead and enforce the discrimination against them - against the feeling of the majority of Egyptians, Muslims and Christians alike. 

Only 2 months ago, the second highest ranking Christian clergy in Egypt announced that the Christian Holy Book enjoins Christian to support Mubarak governments, and prohibits protesting against rulers in general, with rare exceptions
"الأنبا بيشوى سكرتير المجمع المقدس لـ «المصرى اليوم»: الكتاب المقدس يدعونا إلى تأييد الرئيس مبارك"
In English, "Bishop Bishoy, secretary of the Coptic Holy Synod, to 'Almasry Alyum' newspaper: The Holy Book enjoins us to support President Mubarak".  That is the same president heading the government the Church complains it discriminated against Christians!!! (Read the article here.)

The Second man in the Egyptian Coptic Orthodox Church Bishop Bishoy then quotes from scripture that "Apostle Paul said the [political and ruling] authorities are there by the will of God, and that resisting them is resisting the will of God".

It is hard not to be cynical when it comes to judging the intentions of the Egyptian government or the big religious institutions in Egypt (be it the Islamic Al-Azhar, or the Coptic Church).  Like big institutions of all colors and flavors, their own survival usually trumps the interests of their own constituency.
I just hope the Coptic Church publicly rejects that appeasement, otherwise, no one should be surprised if Muslims demand that the bonuses on Islamic occasions should be distribute to Muslims only.

Khaled

Links: