Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Can't wait till the shoe is on the other foot


Not guilty. The Israeli captain who emptied his rifle into a Palestinian schoolgirl (From the British Guardian)
An Israeli army officer who fired the entire magazine of his automatic rifle into a 13-year-old Palestinian girl and then said he would have done the same even if she had been three years old was acquitted on all charges by a military court yesterday.
...
The manner of Iman's killing, and the revelation of a tape recording in which the captain is warned that she was just a child who was "scared to death", made the shooting one of the most controversial since the Palestinian intifada erupted five years ago even though hundreds of other children have also died.
...
In the recording, a soldier in a watchtower radioed a colleague in the army post's operations room and describes Iman as "a little girl" who was "scared to death". After soldiers first opened fire, she dropped her schoolbag which was then hit by several bullets establishing that it did not contain explosive. At that point she was no longer carrying the bag and, the tape revealed, was heading away from the army post when she was shot.
Following the verdict, Capt R burst into tears, turned to the public benches and said: "I told you I was innocent."

They all are innocent.  They will always be innocent. After all, the life of a Palestinian child is nothing but a waste of oxygen. 

The army's initial investigation concluded that the captain had "not acted unethically"
Now I know what they mean when they say the Israeli Army is the most Ethical army on the world.

And suddenly, I feel enlightened.  Thank you Israel.

Khaled
Related Posts:
Links:

Monday, August 30, 2010

This one is so funny, for so many reasons.

‘Sinner’ singer given 39 lashes by rabbis
JERUSALEM POST STAFF   
Punishment for performance in front of "mixed audience".
A singer who performed in front of a “mixed audience” of men and women was lashed 39 times to make him “repent,” after a ruling by a self-described rabbinic court on Wednesday.

Rabbi Amnon Yitzhak, founder of the Shofar organization aimed at bringing Jews “back to religion” (hazara betshuva), has made it his recent mission to fight against musical performances for both men and women.

His “judicial panel,” with Rabbi Ben Zion Mutsafi and another member, sentenced Erez Yechiel to 39 lashes in order to “rid him of his sins.”

In a video clip of the court posted on the Shofar Web site, Ben Zion said that those who make others sin (mahtiei rabim), such as artists who make men and women attend performances or dance together, have no place in the world to come.

He displayed a leather strip he said was made by his father from ass and bull skin, with which Yechiel was to have been whipped.

Yechiel, who said, “I accept upon myself the lashing for my sins,” was ordered to stand by a wooden poll with his head facing north (“from whence the evil inclination comes”), his hands tied with a azure-colored rope (“a symbol of mercy”), and served his “sentence.”
Does that remind you of something?
Khaled

Sunday, August 29, 2010

If you are an Orthodox Jew spiritual leader, it is OK to say such things.

As if it was not enough to have a demagogue idiot fill the air waves in Washington's Lincoln Memorial this Saturday, the hateful racist bigoted evil religious Jewish 'spiritual' leader in Israel also has to have his moment on his holy day.  Do not expect anything holy in his ramblings.

Only an Israeli spiritual leader and head of a party that is in the ruling government in our Ally/Master Nation of Israel can utter this and cause no global wave of condemnation by the 'civilized world' leaders.


Meet Ovadia Yosef: a Shining Light Unto the Nations.
"Abu Mazen and all these evil people should perish from this world," Rabbi Ovadia was quoted as saying during his weekly sermon at a synagogue near his Jerusalem home. "God should strike them with a plague, them and these Palestinians."

In 2001, the spiritual leader of the ultra-Orthodox faction gave a speech in which he also called for Arabs' annihilation.
"It is forbidden to be merciful to them," he was quoted as saying. "You must send missiles to them and annihilate them. They are evil and damnable."

Khaled

Link:
Previous posts showing the 'glorious spirituality' of Israeli religious leaders and community:

Common Nonsense: Glenn Beck - the Triumph of Ignorance


How much longer we have to endure idiocy being the loudest voice in the country?

We are supposed to be better than that.

It is hard to find anything to say about 'Beck the idiot' that has not been said before.  But when a village clown has the power to mobilize tens of thousands on demand: that is a sad day.  He tarniches MLK memories with a fake call to 'restoring honor' to our country, on a day and in a place where MLK made the call that he is most remembered and revered for.

Restoring Honor?!

How about restoring sanity?
 Unfortunately, that is not a call that will mobilize many these days.
 Khaled

The picture and the title taken from:
And for something sane to read, check The Nation:

    Sunday, August 15, 2010

    The World Is Full of Ground Zeroes

    A true patriot shows his love for fellow citizens
    The nonsensical and mostly hateful discussion about the the so-called 'Ground-Zero Mosque' just shows how politics and religion are almost one and the same thing in many areas of the US at present.

    The so-called separation of Church and State is a great principle, but is getting  less and less implemented.  And even when religion is not explicitly part of the public discussion, the religious tones seem to underlie the discourse.

    In my opinion, it is no coincidence that this ugly situation is being kindled more and more in preparation for the the November primaries where the politicians of the 'American Party of God', aka the Republican Party, would sell there souls - if they have any - for a seat in the congress.

    But one good thing that came out of this is the energization of many good people in the defence of the group that wants ot build the Cordoba Islamic Center, and of Muslims in America against the tide of hate they are facing.

    A good friend of ours has forwarded me an article in the Huffington Post that that is mostly a letter written by a friend of hers, Anya Cordell.  Our friend describes Anya Cordell as a Jewish activist that "... has been actively engaged in monitoring and responding to the rising tide of distortions and lies related to Islam, Muslims and groups designated as the other."

    I will be quoting excerpts from the letter only here, but the introduction by the Huffington Post writer, William Spear, is also very well-worth you time, and you can read the whole thing here.

    ... I've been wondering about your response to the multiple traumas related to 9/11 and lower Manhattan; the victims on the planes and on the ground, the rescue workers, the witnesses on the scene and watching on screens (all of us), and Muslims the world over who became instantly associated with something as horrifying and destructive as this event. As you know, I received the 2010 Spirit of Anne Frank Outstanding Citizen Award from The Anne Frank Center USA (in lower Manhattan ) for my work against the designating of any group as "Other." At this time of controversy surrounding the Islamic Cultural Center in New York, I thought I'd share my reflections with you and your audience.
    When I think about the issue of "sacred ground" at the site of the 9/11 attacks in New York, and what should occur on or around it, I think about the innumerable "ground zeroes" around the world, where loved ones of families we never hear of have died in unspeakable violence. I think about what monuments or markers do, or do not, exist to commemorate where they fell or burned or disintegrated. Despite the unspeakable trauma in New York, it strikes me as quite a luxury to be able to memorialize and sanctify such ground, a luxury afforded to only a very few grieving families, the world over.
    After September 11, a number of innocent men, not just Muslim or Arab, but also Sikh, Hindu, South Asian, and others, were murdered in the U.S. by self-avowed 'patriot' vigilantes. I know the families of some of these victims. The widow of one works every day standing exactly where her husband was shot in cold blood, behind the counter of the service station he ran. There is no hushed and sacred ground there, except for an instant when momentary wisps of incense her father lights in the doorway each day fade away, just before the customers tramp through to pay for their gas, cigarettes, lottery tickets and sodas. Customers do remember and speak of the murdered man who was the soul of generosity -- a U.S. citizen who was Hindu, from India, who would let you drive away with a tank of gas and the promise that you'd pay him back if you didn't have money in your wallet that day. I suppose their memory is his memorial. Similarly, a Sikh family works every day where their loved one was slain, in Mesa, Arizona on September 15, 2001 by a killer who had vowed to "kill the ragheads responsible for 9/11," and instead murdered a sweet man wearing a turban as a tenet of his Sikh faith.
    There is no memorial at the intersection where I live, where a black neighbor, was gunned down by a white supremacist in 1999, although we did organize nightly walks from the site, which folks attended for months, sometimes accompanied by the victim's wife and children, two of whom witnessed their father's shooting. There is a slight imprint of a leaf in the cement curb where he fell, (I think the curb was set before the murder), a coincidence that feels to me a tiny bit meaningful.
    These are my thoughts when I read of the families of some of those who died in lower Manhattan, wanting "ground zero" and its environs (how far?) to be hallowed in a way that only the most privileged nations can afford. ..
    Perfectly innocent people die daily as victims of what is referred to as "collateral damage" in dusty parts of the globe. Children disintegrate stumbling across minefields. All manner of mayhem and terrorism destroy lives, but somehow we imagine that those who were lucky enough to have lived and worked in New York apparently stand (figuratively, no longer literally) far apart from these multitudes of others, who were equally innocent, whose deaths were equally shocking, whose families loved them just as much and who also clawed at earth with bare hands trying desperately to rescue and recover them. ...
    After 9/11 I felt compelled to reach out to the innocent families I mentioned above, and in the years since, I've watched the anti-Muslim drumbeat intensify in ways that impact multitudes of innocent people. All the Muslims I know are traumatized by the stereotyping and characterizations that are now rampant. Rather than celebrating 9/11 (as they have been accused), they despair of it. All of them fear; children being taunted and bullied, adults being more vulnerable in public and in the workplace. ...
    Following a presentation, a student once whispered to me, "Thank you so much for your program. I'm Muslim, but no one here knows it." That sent chills down my spine, reminding me of historic times when people needed to try to "pass" to be safe. As a Jewish woman, the moment made me think of Anne Frank, and the disparity between the Nazi stereotypes of Jews, and the reality of the innocents who were slaughtered. It also made me think of the heroic non-Jewish friends who supported Anne's family in hiding, and the necessity of crossing divides to be allies for one another. ...
    I would trust my Muslim and Hindu and Sikh friends with my life. I'm sure there are some Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, Christians and others who might terrify me. In my experience there are wonderful people of all faiths, who claim their religion has taught them their values, and awful people of all faiths who also claim their religion has taught them their values. I am much more interested in meeting people than in labeling them. ...
     Khaled

     Anya Cordell, Author, RACE: An OPEN & SHUT Case
    Links:

    Friday, August 6, 2010

    American victim of our Israeli Masters finally speaks out.

    Emily Henochowicz is a Jewish American young woman who was in the occupied Palestinian Territory at the time the Israeli 'Defence' Forces slaughtered several Turkish civilians and one American  in the Gaza flotilla largest ship, Mavi Marmara.  In the protests that erupted in Ramallah the following day, that young art student lost her left eyes after a member of the Israeli 'Defence' Forces aimed his gas canister gun directly at unarmed demonstrators and, simply, pulled the trigger.

    Emily Henochowicz
    The Israeli Masters are usually accustomed to violently responding to Palestinians even when they are peacefully protesting. And if Israeli response leads to death of a little girl or an old man, or the maiming of scores of young Palestinians, that is still OK - safety of the masters is of utmost importance and takes priority over the lives and well being of an Arab or even many Arabs.

    Violence by Israeli bullies against Arabs is not usually the bullies are held accountable for.  And if a soldier or an officer is unlucky enough to be taped while, for example, shooting an Arab who is a hand-cuffed and blind-folded at short range (Reuters Video), the worse that could happen is usually moving them to another 'Defence' unit where they can resume their 'offensive activities.  For the Israeli masters, good life must go on.

    This time it was an American young woman - and a Jewish one -  that got injured.  She lost her left eye, and is lucky she is alive.  Yet, hell did not open loose for the Israeli cowards that feel they can abuse Arabs without fear of any accountability.

    The fact that she is American did not make any difference.  The fact that she is Jewish, and that her father is an Israeli did not make much difference either. Our US government did not summon the Israeli ambassador, or issue an immediate strong denouncement of the violence against unarmed civilian American woman.  They usually save their convulsions for Iran as they did after Iran's government repression of protests by domestic opposition after the last Iranian elections.

    I guess in the hierarchy, Israel trumps not only Arabs and their interest, but also Americans and their interests.  Some cowardly government and politicians we have.

    Sadly,  it is not only the US government; the main stream media that did not pay any attention to one of their own citizens violently abused by a friendly government that we send aid to, and protect in all international venues at the expense of our own interest.  Yet we behave as if they are our masters.

    Emily Henochowicz was interviewed recently by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now and it is worth watching.


    Khaled.

    Links:

    Sunday, August 1, 2010

    Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) put their dirty foot in their mouth.

    Abraham Foxman
    I never liked the ADL.  Somehow they send a vibe of sneaky, dishonest and unprincipled opportunism.  No matter what subject they meddle in, their stance reeks of pure cheeky pro-Israel propaganda (i.e., Hasbara) coated with an ultra-thin layer of civil rights defense.

    The only demonstration I organized was against their ugly head, Abraham Foxman who was invited - by some people who like pushing the envelope - to speak as a keynote speaker before St Louis Interfaith Partnership.
    It was a joke to invite the head of a so-called civil right advocacy group who - was a week earlier in Israel to support their bloody deliberate assault on Lebanon civilians and infrastructure - to be the key note speaker in an annual meeting of INTERFAITH organization.  It was a slap in the faith to St. Louis Muslim community.

    The logic of pro-Israel apologists is usually that anything a loud-mouth pro-Israel lobbyist does is an example of sublime morality, innocence and thoughtfulness.  And if you do not like... Well, that is because you are an anti-Semite - or a self-hating Jew, depending of the circumstances.

    I am very happy that the shameful Anti Defamation League has recently opened its out only to put its dirty foot in it.
    Their stance is deliberate, and 'well argued' -so it will be very difficult for them to spin it into something like: 'it was taken of of context'  or 'it was an impulsive low-level and unauthorised person who did it, and we fire him'.   This one is sticking - and it shows the real ADL: bigoted and hypocritical, just as I always suspected.
    The statement contains a sentence that will go done their history as a landmark of their hypocrisy:
    "But ultimately this is not a question of [civil] rights, but a question of what is right."
    Coming for this 'pretend' civil rights group, it is a statement that makes you want to vomit.  Of course, from their perspective 'what is right' is usually what they deem it to be so.

    What they did is not sitting  well with many progressive Jewish voices and they are outspoken against it.  Jeffrey Blankfort has an excellent post on the wonderful MondoWeiss blog about the ADL and thier dirty history.
    Other postings on the same great blog cover other aspects of the issue.
    ‘ADL’ statement rationalizing bigotry draws wide scorn - Philip Weiss - MondoWeiss
    Foxman plays Holocaust card - Philip Weiss -MondoWeiss
    And by Paul Crugman in the New York Times Blog
    Bad for the Jews - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com
    It is nice to see an ugly face finally lose the half-pound of make-up it is hiding behind.

    Khaled

    Post-script

    Zakaria poses thr question:"Does Foxman believe that bigotry is OK if people think they're victims? Does the anguish of Palestinians, then, entitle them to be anti-Semitic?"
    And I, Khaled, may add: Does the Jewish suffering during the holocaust justify the racism and bigotry that Palestinian face on daily basis in there own occupied historic Homeland?

    Thursday, July 15, 2010

    Polygamy : My 2-cents in response to a comment.

    In my previous posting Wanna b a bride, I talked about the problem facing Muslim women in many Muslim societies not finding Muslim husbands.  One of the comments mentioned polygamy in Islam asked about its impact of the problem discussed in the posting.

    I responded with enough material that may deserved its own 'mini' posting.  Also, re-posting my comment may lead to stimulating a discussion on polygamy.  So, here is the question and my comment.

    MW said in a comment: "If some men have more than one wife, does that mean that there is also a proportional amount of men with no wives?"
    My response was:

    This is not a problem in most cases because the proportion of polygamous men is tiny. I lived in Egypt for 30 years and have not known of a single person in my family, friends, family friends, coworkers and other immediate contacts that married more than one woman. It does happen (more commonly in rural areas, especially if first marriage did not produce children), but the proportion is very small.

    That could theoretically still lead to disturbance of the balance between men and women available for marriage, but only if one does not know enough about the man-female sex ratio in population at different ages and under different conditions of society dynamics.

    Natural discrepancy in sex survival rates, tendency in ALL societies to maintain few years difference on average between husbands and wives, emigration sex biases, wars, etc, all result in about 5% bias in favor of women. You can research this if you will. I already have.

    Of course if polygyny becomes a goal in itself (usually in rich spoilt societies of the gulf), it looses the actual legitimacy that comes from the very tight regulation on polygamy in Islam. The only verse that allows polygamy (i.e., polygyny) in Islam has pretty tight conditions for that practice and, still, it was in the context of extending supportive family structure to a large number of orphans after some of the early battles that was associated with significant losses amongst Muslims men in the battle, leaving behind unsupported women and children in a society where support comes traditionally in the form of nuclear family structure.

    Many Arab and Muslim societies have legally restricted the right to have more than one wife to varying degrees, and in most Muslim society polygamy IS looked down upon unless its legitimacy could be gleaned from the circumstance. Men who marry a new 18 year old girl every few years are not considered appropriately behaving. Polygamy in early days of Islam meant to marry an older woman, usually with children, as a second wife, not a 'trophy' young girl to prove that you are 'the Man'.

    While I do not intend, or need, to justify polygyny under the strict limitations in Islam by mentioning extramarital affairs, I think it is most telling that rates of polygamy among Muslims is a small fraction of adultery among married men AND women in Western societies.  I am not picking on Western societies, but that is where more statistics are available).   And by marriage, I mean ongoing marriages - not past marriages or among separated couple.

    Khaled

    Tuesday, July 13, 2010

    Israel military: Flotilla killings justified (God is OK with that, the Rabbi thinks)!


    Israel has killed thousands of Palestinian civilians: men, women and children without a second thought or remorse. So, what's a few more Turks killed in the big scheme of Israeli policies?

    Besides, a Rabbi knows best when is comes to what pleases God, and the rabbi said it is OK.

    Chabad rabbi declared his 'Godly' view of where Judaism stands:

    I don’t believe in western morality, i.e. don’t kill civilians or children, don’t destroy holy sites, don’t fight during holiday seasons, don’t bomb cemeteries, don’t shoot until they shoot first because it is immoral.

    The only way to fight a moral war is the Jewish way: Destroy their holy sites. Kill men, women and children (and cattle).

    The first Israeli prime minister who declares that he will follow the Old Testament will finally bring peace to the Middle East. First, the Arabs will stop using children as shields. Second, they will stop taking hostages knowing that we will not be intimidated. Third, with their holy sites destroyed, they will stop believing that G-d is on their side. Result: no civilian casualties, no children in the line of fire, no false sense of righteousness, in fact, no war.

    Zero tolerance for stone throwing, for rockets, for kidnapping will mean that the state has achieved sovereignty. Living by Torah values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.

    Rabbi Manis Friedman
    Bais Chana Institute of Jewish Studies
    St. Paul, MN
    So, living by the Torah leads the 'Light unto the nations' to prevail over the rotten ones who advocate not killing children or destroy places of worship (The opinions of the despicable rabbi were taken verbatim from an 'Ask the Rabbi' article in Moment Magazine,  Summer of 2009).

    Nice religion that 'man-of-god has'.

    And, by the way, the nice Rabbi has not - and will not - be declared a terrorist, charged with hate incitement, a hate crime or even 'a hate-misdemeanor'.  And he will never get deported to the only homeland he believes in that was promised to the likes of him.

    And the followers that flock to his hate-spewing place of worship and pay money to keep him 'productive' will always be secure from harassment, FBI interrogations, and surveillance by our security agencies.


    Khaled

    Sunday, July 11, 2010

    We are nice. But if you do not like us, we will force you to. - On the BDS and Israeli proto-fascism

    It must be hard to feel that you are great, and yet that you have to have Every One's approval and acceptance, even the people you occupy and oppress.  I think Israel hunger to get even the 'terrorists' to accept tit as legitimate is a manifestation of that.

    Israel has more nuclear weapons that China, exports more weapons that France and Britain, is able to occupy concurrently parts of three countries without anyone frowning, executes others (enemy or civilians), extra-judicially and extra-territorially with impunity, and manipulates the governments of the world (including the US While House and Congress) as if they are manipulating puppets.  Yet, the tiny bit of non-recognition by Hamas, or the tiny bit of disapproval by the Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) movement seem  like an existential threat to them.  Although, to Israel, every thing always seemed like an existential threat anyway, including - but not limited to - emotional rejection.

     I had to laugh a month ago when Israel and the West Bank settlers were threatening the Palestinian authority when the PA was floating the idea of boycotting goods manufactured by settlersIt is like taking hostages, use them as slave labor to make products that you then force the slaves to buy, and penalize them if the would not!!!

    Academic and artistic boycott (described by ultra-Zionists as intellectual terrorism!!), in addition to economic boycott (also called economic terrorism by the same clowns) is gaining more and more grounds as the illegitimacy of the Israeli stance is becoming too stinky to hide.

    And while the economic impact on Israel will never be dramatic, it is that eternal sense of illegitimacy that will always haunt Israel and make them ultra-sensitive to rejection.

    This article from the British Guardian presents the reaction of the Israeli regime to the local supporters of the BDS movement within Israel - the righteously Israeli Jews that see through the fog of the Zionist propaganda.
    Here are some excerpt from the guardian article.
    Israeli academics hit back over bid to pass law that would criminalize them
    An academic backlash has erupted in Israel over proposed new laws, backed by the government of Binyamin Netanyahu, to criminalise a handful of Israeli professors who openly support a campaign against the continuing occupation of the West Bank.
    ... A proposed bill introduced into the Israeli parliament – the Knesset – would outlaw boycotts and penalise their supporters. Individuals who initiated, encouraged or provided support or information for any boycott or divestment action would be made to pay damages to the companies affected. Foreign nationals involved in boycott activity would be banned from entering Israel for 10 years, and any "foreign state entity" engaged in such activity would be liable to pay damages.
    ... Adi Oz, culture editor on the Tel Aviv weekly Ha'ir, appeared on Israeli national radio explaining her support for recent boycott activity. "When the Pixies cancelled their concert here I was disappointed," she says. "But I was not critical of the Pixies, I was critical of our government, because they are responsible for Israel's isolation."
    There is a building momentum to restrict their freedom to dissent, a tendency described by some Israeli journalists and thinkers as 'proto-fascism'.  Although, in my mind and to most Palestinians and many Arab Israelis, there is nothing 'proto' (or early phase in plain English) about the Israeli regime fascism.  Palestinians have suffered from it, i.e., franc fascist behavior, for many decades.

    It cannot be put in a better way than how Uri Avnery put it in 'A little Red Light'
    In our present situation there are some dangerous indications. The last war showed a further decline in our moral standards. The hatred towards Israel’s Arab minority is on the rise, and so is the hatred towards the occupied Palestinian people who are suffering a slow strangulation. In some circles, the cult of brute force is gaining strength. The democratic regime is in a never-ending crisis. The economic situation may descend into chaos, so that the masses will long for a “strongman”. And the belief that we are a “chosen people” is already deeply rooted.
    Khaled

    Links
    Israeli academics hit back over bid to pass law that would ...
    BDS campaign wants Israel to abide by international law
     Artists' Boycott Strikes a Dissonant Note Inside Israel - NYTimes.com
     Economic activism against the occupation: Working from within
     Canada: Queers against apartheid beat censorship bid
     Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)
     Why Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel?
     Settlers: PA boycott – economic terror - Israel News, Ynetnews
    And this is a must read:

    Saturday, July 10, 2010

    We definitely do not have monoploy over crazy clergy any more

    I guess turning the other cheek and walking the extra mile is passée.
    I am not sure which Jesus this guy believes in.

    www.huffingtonpost.com
    ATLANTA — A minister in Georgia is challenging the state's ban on guns in churches after the U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a decision supporting Americans' right to keep and bear arms.
    The Rev. Jonathan Wilkins accuses state officials of violating his First Amendment freedom of religion right and his Second Amendment right to bear arms.

    Khaled
    Link:

    Wednesday, June 30, 2010

    Wanna b a Bride? - On the problem of marriage amongst American Muslim women


    What do Muslim Egyptian women and Muslim American women have in common?

    Until recently, I would have answered: very little other than their religion.  But over the last couple of years I have become more aware of another thing in common: a rapidly growing problem of finding a suitable husband.  The problem is no laughing matter, and it threatens to be a very ominous threat to social structure, both in Egypt (and likely many other Arab countries) as well as in the American Muslim communities.

    The title of the post is borrowed from a hilarious series of blog-posts turned into a book by a talented 30-year-old Egyptian bachelorette pharmacist who decided to go public with her 'adventures' while looking for a husband (or waiting for a husband to find her).  If you can read Arabic and understand Egyptian dialect, that blog and book will give you hours of thoughtful fun that will make you laugh out loud.  Sorry, but it is an Arabic only site, although the blog and book are being translated into - of all languages - Italian!!  Do not even ask me why.

    But this blog post is not about the problem in Egypt.  And I have been contemplating writing about some marriage and divorce problems in the American Muslim community for some time. Today I want to talk only about marriage - or lack there of - amongst highly eligible American Muslim women.

    Getting married has rarely ever been an easy process for both men and women in Muslim minority communities.  But more recently the number of American Muslim women getting married has dropped significantly below the number of Muslim men getting married. Anyone that is involved in 'matrimonial activities' can tell you that matrimonial events tend to have 6-8 times as many women as men.

    Two obvious factors have perpetuated the problem. One is of a religious nature, and the other is of a social/cultural nature.

    Islamically, and if the Quran is understood at face value, Muslim men are allowed to marry a 'believer' woman outside the Islamic faith.  This usually means marrying a Jewish or Christian woman.  There are subtle constraints but, in general, such marriages are not looked down upon within the Muslim community.

    On the other hand, Muslim women are not supposed to marry outside the Islamic faith.  The Quran (5:5) gives an explicit permission for Muslim men, without mentioning Muslim women.  That 'prohibition by omission' has been the undisputed norm in Muslim societies since the early days of Islam. 

    I am fully aware of the reasoning behind the distinction between the case for men and women, and I do not see that the Quranic verse that discusses that issue tolerant to any other interpretation.  But I also understand that the permission given to Muslim men to marry outside the faith is not an unrestrained permission.  It is even more constrained when the exercise of such permission leads to serious harm to other Muslims, above all Muslim women in the same society.

    But marrying outside the faith is not the only reason for the problem.  Another reason, that I personally believe to be a more sinister one, is the tendency of many Muslim American men to marry a Muslim woman from 'the old mother land'.

    I do not really understand why that is happening, and I have few guesses:
    - Larger extended family in the old country for those that want to marry within the extended family only (a tradition in some conservative societies).
    - 'Mother-in-law-to-be' favors marrying a girl from the old country believing that she would make a better daughter-in-law.
    - Some conservative men believe that a 'good girl' from the old country is more 'pious, pure, and – more importantly - obedient' than an American born and raise Muslim girl.
    - And finally, and as a woman friend once put it, Muslim young men in American societies tend to be less mature intellectually and socially than American Muslim young women of similar age, social status and education.  Thus they feel threatened by their female counter parts, and want to seek a woman that does not make them feel threatened.

    Regardless of the reason, the abundance of very well qualified American Muslim young women who cannot find a suitable husband is a serious problem.  The worst part is that the religious and social implications of that problem are not even discussed frequently enough.

    This definitely is not a problem that harms only women in the longterm, but because only women appear to be adversely affected now community leadership, mostly older immigrant men, does not seem to be interested in tackling it or even shedding light on it.

    A recent article in the Washington Post covered that topic, but the conclusions were slanted in a direction that I do not agree with.  Still, I am happy that some Muslims activists are bringing  the issue up, and are doing something about it. 

    Their conclusions are unfortunately difficult of me to swallow.  They actually argue that since the Quran did not explicitly prohibit Muslim women from marrying out side the faith, and since permitting men to do that leads to the current problem for Muslim women, the answers to the problem should be to allow Muslim women to marry outside the faith, i.e., Muslim woman can marry a Christian or Jewish man.

    I tend to support a different approach to solving the problem.  It is a well know rule in Islamic jurisprudence that restricting or prohibiting the exercise of what is permitted and lawful is allowed if it leads to harm.  Many Muslim countries, for example, have strong restrictions on polygamy – and for very good reasons.

    Some Islamic scholars have actually suggested that marrying outside the community (Islamic American community in this case) should be forbidden as it leads to an obvious harm to half the society: Muslim American women.  Of course in a free society, no one can 'force' Muslim men to restrict their 'lawful rights', but like in many other cases (e.g., polygamy), strongly-held social pressures have effectively restricted the exercise of polygamy in societies that have not yet had legal restriction on it.

    Traditional religious and societal leadership in American Muslim communities tend to be sluggish and scared of change.   They are more comfortable sweeping problems under the carpet, and would rather talk about generalities than offer a specific solution to a specific problem.  That attitude applies to a wide range of religious, political and social contemporary issues relevant to the community.  I do not have much expectation from them anymore.

    It is difficult to say if the threat of revolt by Muslim American younger women to adopt alternative jurisprudence opinions is conceivable.  And, I do not personally agree with the alternative jurisprudence opinion expressed in the WP article mentioned above.  But I also realize that nothing short of revolt by American Muslim women can wake up our intellectually stagnant leadership.

    Khaled
    As usual, short comments and opinion are welcomed and can be made anonymously.  But if you feel strongly about that issue, and regardless of which side you are on, please put your thoughts in a short posting format and email to khaledhamid.ol@gmail.com.  If it is respectful and intelligently-argued, I will post it as a full posting.  Your anonymity is guaranteed if you want.  May be we can have a serious conversation about this topic.

    Sunday, June 27, 2010

    Israeli Prime Minister offers support to the Gaza Freedom Flotilla - albeit indirect

    An interesting post by the Palestinian American Activist Ali Abunimah.  It goes to show that maintaining lies is difficult, and over time the truth comes out, even if the Israeli government is the brain behind the lie.
    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has offered unexpected support to the Gaza Freedom Flotilla and others who plan to challenge his country's naval blockade of the Israeli-occupied Gaza Strip. Haaretz reports his comments today:
    "I call on all human rights activists in the world - go to Tehran, that's where there is a human rights violation," said Netanyahu during his meeting with the Austrian Chancellor, Werner Faymann, in which he discussed Israel's ease of the Gaza blockade and flotillas planning on breaching Israel's Gaza blockade. "Today, after we lifted the civilian blockade of Gaza there is no reason or justification for further flotillas," he said.
    So what Netanyahu appears to be conceding is that the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, which Israel attacked in international waters, killing 9 passengers and injuring dozens of others on 31 May, was in fact fully justified as long as Israel maintained the blockade which he claims now to have lifted.
    But of course Israel has not really lifted the illegal blockade. Netanyahu's comments demonstrate that Israel's main purpose is to relieve international pressure and avoid further embarrassing flotillas challenging it.
    The reality remains that 1.5 million people in Gaza are locked into what amounts to a giant prison camp for surplus humans of the wrong sort. Israel controls land, sea and aerial access to them. Their crime is simply that they are not Jews, ....
     Read the rest of Abunimah's post here.

    Khaled

    Wednesday, June 23, 2010

    What is in heaven, and what is on earth

    There is always something worth reading in the Huffington Post.  these two news items happened to be next to each other. Some how that seemed like a message.

    And now basic facts:
    Israel:
    • Population 7.5 millions (and, if you wish, additional 10-12 million Jews in the rest of the world)
    • Gross Domestic Product: :$195 Billions (IMF)
    • Literacy rates: 97%
    And, Saudi Arabia:
    • Population: 28 millions
    • Gross Domestic Product: :$370 Billions (IMF), or $460 billions as per the World Bank)
    • Literacy rates: 82%
    And of course I can talk also about who develops, manufacture and exports weapons on one hand, and who buys billions of dollars worth of weapons to corrode in the desert sand on the other hand (or puts the weapons to use only against small-firearm-equipped Arab and Muslim Yemeni rebels).


    I guess one can have money, manpower, and access to education, but in the end what becomes of you depends on how you set your priorities and how you allocate your resources.

    This reminds me of verse 18 chapter 24:
    " for God makes [His] messages clear unto you - and God is all-knowing, wise!"
    وَيُبَيِّنُ اللَّهُ لَكُمُ الْآيَاتِ وَاللَّهُ عَلِيمٌ حَكِيمٌ
    Will we ever learn?
    Khaled

    Thursday, June 10, 2010

    A 'peaceful' IDF soldier shooting a 'terrorist' peace activist

    MondoWeiss is one of the best sites covering Israeli Palestinian News. Their coverage of the latest events with the assault on the Turkish ship and the massacre of Turkish peace activist. Many of their latest posting are refuting the idiotic claim that the activists were - like every thing else in the universe - a threat to Israel.

    Today they posted a graphic video possibly of the shooting at close range of one of the activists after 2 soldiers have been 'peacefully' pummeling him with their boots. May be the poor activist was in so much pain, and the soldiers' merciful IDF-trained souls could not bear to see him suffer any longer.

    Yes, that was it. Mercy killing. I must be grateful to the Israeli forces that they have not send a bill (yet!) to the victim's family charging them for the bullets and labour.

    Take a look at this so when idiots make stupid claims about what went on that day, you know what the truth is.

    On May 31, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the actions of IDF soldiers who had conducted the raid on the Mavi Marmara, killing at least nine of its passengers, as “a clear case of self-defense because as our soldiers were inspecting these ships, they were attacked – they were almost lynched. They were attacked with clubs, with knives, perhaps with live gunfire, and they had to defend themselves – they were going to be killed.”

    That was before video emerged appearing to show two Israeli soldiers first pummeling with their boots and then shooting one of the victims as he lay at their feet. To stand above an injured man and then finish him off with rounds from an assault rifle can by no ones estimation be described as an act of self-defense.

    The link to that posting can be found here.

    Khaled

    Links:
    Other Videos:And after a massacre, some petty theft seems like a minor transgression. I guess, it is a foreigner peace activist's money - so it is free game.

    Tuesday, June 8, 2010

    Jewish boat to Gaza is sailing soon. Israel's murders may not be quickly forgotten this time

    It has been a little over a week since Israel's bloody killing spree on the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara took place. At this point British, French, Italian, Russian and German officials have called for international probe (Check this: EU states competing over Israel policy). The UN is on board and already working on the probe team to be headed by former New Zealand prime minister.
    [Addendum: The US State Department has just issued a statement endorsing international probe into the events as well.]

    The good news is that Jewish activists all over the world are not letting go and are spearheading maintaining the pressure on Israel (and trying to influence the US as well). Ten thousand Israelis have demonstrated in protest of Israels aggression action and some even did that here in the US. Who knows, maybe the near-dead Israeli liberals and Israeli Left will be 'revivable'.

    I received this email today from the group list of the Palestinian Solidarity Committee in St. Louis (which I strongly suggest to subscribe to to get updates on local pro-peace activism in St. Lois) . It made me very happy, and I wanted to share the news.
    The Jewish boat [GazaFriends] to Gaza is sailing soon

    In an undisclosed harbor in the Mediterranean, a small vessel is waiting for a special mission. She will be sailing to Gaza. In order to avoid sabotage, the exact date and name of the port of departure will be announced only shortly before her launch.

    "Our purpose is to call an end to the siege of Gaza, to this illegal collective punishment of the whole civilian population. Our boat is small, so our donations can only be symbolic: we are taking school bags, filled with donations from German school children, musical instruments and art materials. For the medical services we are taking essential medicines and small medical equipment, and for the fishermen we are taking nets and tackle. We are liaising with the medical, educational and mental health services in Gaza.

    ''In attacking the Freedom Flotilla, Israel has once again demonstrated to the world a heinous brutality. But I know that there are very many Israelis who compassionately and bravely campaign for a just peace. As broadcasting journalists from mainstream television programs are accompanying our boat, Israel will have a great chance to show the world that there is another way, a way of courage not fear, a way of hope not hate'', says Edith Lutz, one of the organizers and passenger on the ''Jewish boat''.

    The ''Jüdische Stimme'' (Jewish Voice for a Just Peace in the Near East), along with her friends of EJJP (European Jews for a Just Peace in the Near East) and Jews for Justice For Palestinians (UK) are sending a call to the leaders of the world to help Israel find her way back to reason, a sense of humanity and a life without fear. ''Jewish Voices'' expects the political leaders of Israel and the world to guarantee a safe passage for the small vessel to Gaza, thus helping to form a bridge towards peace.
    The arrogance of the Israeli governments, and its well financed propaganda hasbara army in the US need to be met with outspoken opposition and activism. Please do not stand still and every bit of effort helps. Let us hope the momentum keeps building.

    The St Louis Palestinian Solidarity Committee has a great web site for updates and resources. Please check it, and subscribe to their news letter.

    Your effort, not only your sympathy is profoundly needed if things are to change for the better.

    Khaled
    Related Blog Post:
    Interesting links related to the legal aspects of the flotilla massacre:

    Wednesday, June 2, 2010

    Israel: a morally bankrupt country

    Day after day a new nail is hammered in the coffin of any claim that Israel has any shreds of morality or decency. For decades, their high powered propaganda machine and their real control on many major news outlets managed to blind the average Westerner about the truth in that unlucky part of the world that is 'blessed' with Israel's presence. Europe is almost free from the mental fog about Israel that the US is still clouded in. But even here, American Jews and non-Jews alike are getting to see the truth.

    After all, how many times can a bully claim that beating and shooting a little unarmed kid is necessary because the kid is an existential threat to the bully?

    In these sad times, only Turkey stands out as a symbol of dignity and pride (here and here). This gallery shows how much Turkey's posture is appreciated throughout the world.

    Arab governments, not surprisingly, exhibit the usual lack of spine, lack of pride and even lack of simple dignity. Egypt miserly 'eased' its own blockade of Gaza (!!!) to allow crossing of Medical emergencies and students traveling to study outside Gaza, as if these cases should have been blockaded at any time. And even Algeria, thousands of miles away, was cowardly enough to ban demostration in support of the victims of the flotilla massacre.

    The US wanders between wishy-washy stance by Obama and the State Department on the one hand, and the stupid comments by Biden on the other (See also Gaza flotilla raid:'So what's the big deal here?' asks Joe Biden ).

    American media is busy with whatever the heck they keep themselves and the average American busy with. And until Jon Stewart says something about it on The Daily Show, most Americans probably would not have even noticed what is going on there. And after a few laughs, they would not even remember what he was talking about anyway.

    Most European governments seem as if they are just tongue-tied, while their people are on the streets in front of Israeli embassies protesting. (See Norwegians ready to boycott Israel, and
    Thousands protest flotilla deaths, clashes in Athens).

    Nothing I say will make you feel different, and I am tired of shouting that Israel is an immoral regime because it is so obvious.

    On the bright side, honest and righteous Jews everywhere seem to have the loudest voices critical of Israel in the media and in pro-Palestinian organizations all over the world. So I will only provide links to several article and videos that may be a source of comfort. All the links are from Israeli source, or by non-Israel Jewish authors and journalist. So, let us see some of their contributions:

    And for many moving pictures from all over the world, check this gallery: Anti-Israel protests (The Guardian, UK). One of that galleries pictures truly embodies the new pro-Palestinian spirit in the world, and the immorality and brutality of the Israelis: American woman shedding blood for Palestine.

    The 'blood letting' is courtesy of our Israeli allies at no cost to the American peace activist, other than her share of the 3 billion dollars of military aid we give Israel every year.

    I know justice will come, and Israel as we know it will not last.

    Khaled

    Addendum (June 8, 2010):
    Related and interesting links related to the legal aspects of the flotilla massacre:
    In views of some of the discussions in the comments section about the legality of Israel's massacre, I have listed below some of the available links with legal insight. It is not as simple as some of the pro-Israel comments make it look like.




    Wednesday, May 26, 2010

    The mindset may sound Saudi, but the tongue speaks Hebrew!!

    It is always amusing to see how traditional Jewish clergy are as messed up as the worst of the Muslim clergy and fanatics. And with hundreds of thousand of fundamentalist Jews occupying Palestinian occupied territories of the West bank, it is worthwhile exposing who these people are.
    The average person in the US truly believes that in the Israeli Palestinian conflict, the Israeli side represents the good guy; the side that is more like up, the enlightened one that are working hard to make the decent green, respect others religions and ethenicities, and believe in democracy and equality for women.

    But, of course, the average American who knows very little about his or her own political system, is hardly expected to know the intricacies of the orthodox Jewish traditions, especially the tradition of those who occupy the West Bank,harassing and shoot at Palestinians, and have the Israeli army protect their illegal outposts and settlement, funded by our tax dollars. And all is in the name of a God that made a promise to give them the land because they are special.

    Their racism, hatred and tribal and ethnocentric dogma may not bother many here in the US, considering that many in the US would find excuses for Israeli settlers in their 'moral' battle against the 'savage' Arabs.

    What most in the US would not find palatable is their attitude toward women, reminiscent of and in many case more backward than, traditional Saudi attitudes towards women.

    This article I read on the BBC Online is about that, and I thought it is worth sharing it with you.
    The chief rabbi of a West Bank settlement has prohibited women from standing in a local community election.

    Rabbi Elyakim Levanon of the Elon Moreh settlement, near Nablus, said women lacked the authority to stand for the post of local secretary.
    The rabbi made his comments in the community's newspaper after an unidentified young woman wrote to him asking if she could run for the position of community secretary, the Israeli news website Ynet News said: "I am a young woman and I think I have desire and energy to do things," Ynet News quoted the woman as writing to Rabbi Levanon.
    But in his weekly column, Rabbi Levanon wrote that, according to the teachings of influential rabbis, women were not allowed to apply for the position.
    "The first problem is giving women authority, and being a secretary means having authority," Rabbi Levanon wrote in the community's newspaper.
    "Within the family certain debates are held and when opinions are united the husband presents the family's opinion. This is the proper way to prevent a situation in which the woman votes one way and her husband votes another," he wrote.
    He also said it was not appropriate for women to mix with men in late evening meetings of community leaders.
    And for many traditional Saudi clerics -- that Americans think of as having 'caveman mentality' -- that is music to their ears.

    Khaled

    Links:
    West Bank rabbi bans women from local election

    Is that cellular phone Kosher?

    Orthodox strife grips Jerusalem

    And for n never ending list of examples for other things they do, click below:
    Fundamentalist Settlers

    Wednesday, May 19, 2010

    Our Forgotten allies - Part 2: Christian Arabs struggle for Palestine

    In a previous posting I presented my opinion that the Islamization of the Palestinian cause was harmful to Palestinians on one hand, and to all Arabs and Muslims on the other. I strongly believe that it was a short-sighted measure, tactically and strategically.

    The major beneficiary of that mistake was Israel and its Arab- and Muslim-hating supporters who found a great comfort in presenting it to the Western world as a fight between progressive, liberal, egalitarian, and democratic ‘tiny’ Jewish state, and a ‘repressive fundamentalist Islamic ideology’ that controls fifty some states and over a billion Muslims who are ready to launch Holy War on Israel and its Western supporters.

    To a much lesser extend, Muslim fundamentalists also benefited from using the Palestinian slogan as a convenient rallying call to which they give lip service, then turn around to carry on their other agendas (Remember Osama Bin Laden and AlQaeda, invoking the Palestinian issue in speeches, then going on killing Muslim Afghani and Iraqi civilians?).

    Judging from the state of affairs of the world today, it is not difficult to see who actually benefited more from the Islamization paradigm.

    Forgotten in the midst of all the screaming was the Christian Palestinian (as well as Christian Arabs). If you were not from Egypt, Palestine or Lebanon, you probably would not remember that Palestine was nearly 30% Christian in 1948 (1400 years after it came under Arab Muslim control), and is no more than 5% Christian now after 60 years only of Israeli control. You would probably not be aware of the significant contributions many Palestinian Christians and other Arab Christians provided for the Palestinian cause in effort, blood and money.

    Another totally forgotten (and frequently intentionally ignored) aspect of the Christian Palestinian struggle, it the on-going Political involvement of Christian Arabs in the Israeli Palestinian issue. I will highlight here two only of the many examples .

    The first is really an amazing example from Egypt. Since the early 80’s the Camp David Accords have paved the way to some sort of luke warm peace between Egypt and Israel. The people of Egypt in general still find the Israeli presence awkward, and very few have taken the chance to visit Israel. The issue is more complicated for Egyptian Christians, with their holy sited under Israeli control. And since the peace agreements were signed, the Egyptian Church (Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria) under the leadership of Pope Shnouda III has consistently refused to permit Egyptian Christians to visit the Christian Holy sites in occupied Palestine.

    In the first week of this May, the Pope of Alexandria church in a his Cairo weekly sermon re-stated the long-held opinion of the church barring Copts from visiting Israel.
    قال البابا: إن في مصر الكثير من الأماكن المقدسة التي يمكن التبرك بها، أما القدس المحتلة فيجب ألا نندفع عاطفيا نحو زيارتها دون النظر إلى البعد الوطني والسياسي، موضحا أن السلام غائب في تلك المناطق وما زال شعبها الفلسطيني يعاني من ويلات الاحتلال الإسرائيلي وقهره وأشار البابا إلى أنه من الصعب التراجع عن قرار الحظر في المرحلة الراهنة ما لم يتم التوصل إلى السلام الشامل والعادل، لأن السماح للأقباط سيدفع بمئات الآلاف منهم إلى زيارة الأراضي المقدسة خاصة في عيد القيامة، ما يروج للاقتصاد الإسرائيلي ويؤدي إلى إساءة للعلاقات بين الأقباط والأشقاء العرب والفلسطينيين

    Pope Shnouda III said: “There is many [Christian] Holy places in Egypt that can be visited to be blessed with. As for occupied Jerusalem; we should not in an emotional way rush to visit it without considering the political and patriotic dimension”. He elaborated that “peace is absent from those territories, and its Palestinian people are still suffering from the horror of the Israeli occupation and its oppression”.
    The Pope pointed out that "it is very difficult to retract the prohibition [against visiting the holy places in Palestine] at this time unless comprehensive and just peace is achieved. This is because retracting prohibition will lead to hundreds of thousands of Egyptian Christian Copts to visit the holy land, especially for Easter thus supporting Israeli Economy, and leading to harming the relationship between Copts and the Arab and Palestinian brothers."
    For the Pope, boycotting the Holy sites while they are still under Israeli control is an act of resistance. He refuses to provide Israel with the economic benefit and the moral recognition of its authority over occupied holy sites that Israel is so eager to get. for him, the pain of keeping his followers away from their beloved Holy sites is a small price to pay in order to help liberate Palestinians from the evils of Israeli occupation.

    And closer to the heart of the battle field, Palestine, Palestinian Christians are not silent either. Take for example the recent political document "Moment of Truth" released by Kairos Palestine. The document is modeled along an earlier document from Kairos South Africa that aimed at accelerating the fall of the apartheid regime in South Africa. The parallels here are not so subtle. This is a big16-page documents, but it is worth reading. Here are some excerpts:

    A word of faith, hope and love from the heart of the Palestinian suffering
    “This document is the Christian Palestinians’ word to the world about what is happening in Palestine. It is written at this time when we wanted to see the Glory of the grace of God in this land and in the sufferings of its people. In this spirit the document requests the international community to stand by the Palestinian people who have faced oppression, displacement, suffering and clear apartheid for more than six decades. The suffering continues while the international community silently looks on at the occupying State, Israel.”
    As Palestinian Christians we hope that this document will provide the turning point to focus the efforts of all peace-loving peoples in the world, especially our Christian sisters and brothers. We hope also that it will be welcomed positively and will receive strong support, as was the South Africa Kairos document launched in 1985, which, at that time proved to be a tool in the struggle against oppression and occupation.
    The Moment of Truth document about realities on the ground:
    The separation wall erected on Palestinian territory, a large part of which has been confiscated for this purpose, has turned our towns and villages into prisons, separating them from one another, making them dispersed and divided cantons. Gaza, especially after the cruel war Israel launched against it during December 2008 and January 2009, continues to live in inhuman conditions, under permanent blockade and cut off from the other Palestinian territories.

    Israeli settlements ravage our land in the name of God and in the name of force, controlling our natural resources, including water and agricultural land, thus depriving hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, and constituting an obstacle to any political solution.

    Reality is the daily humiliation to which we are subjected at the military checkpoints, as we make our way to jobs, schools or hospitals.
    It has a message to Muslims and to the Christian world, defending Muslims:
    Our message to the Muslims is a message of love and of living together and a call to reject fanaticism and extremism. It is also a message to the world that Muslims are neither to be stereotyped as the enemy nor caricatured as terrorists but rather to be lived with in peace and engaged with in dialogue.
    And it concludes with this very strong message to churches and Christians of the world, praising some, and asking others to repent for what they did to Palestinians:
    6.1 Our word to the Churches of the world is firstly a word of gratitude for the solidarity you have shown toward us in word, deed and presence among us. It is a word of praise for the many Churches and Christians who support the right of the Palestinian people for self determination. It is a message of solidarity with those Christians and Churches who have suffered because of their advocacy for law and justice.

    However, it is also a call to repentance; to revisit fundamentalist theological positions that support certain unjust political options with regard to the Palestinian people. It is a call to stand alongside the oppressed and preserve the word of God as good news for all rather than to turn it into a weapon with which to slay the oppressed. The word of God is a word of love for all His creation. God is not the ally of one against the other, nor the opponent of one in the face of the other. God is the Lord of all and loves all, demanding justice from all and issuing to all of us the same commandments.

    We ask our sister Churches not to offer a theological cover-up for the injustice we suffer, for the sin of the occupation imposed upon us. Our question to our brothers and sisters in the Churches today is: Are you able to help us get our freedom back, for this is the only way you can help the two peoples attain justice, peace, security and love?
    What I am trying to bring up in this posting is not that there are good Christians, because to question that is ignorant and immoral. I am trying to show how silly it is to present the Israeli Palestinian conflict as an Islamic issue only. Our Christian Arabs are not only as harmed by the on-going conflict as Muslims are but also they are a tremendous and resourceful ally. Their involvement can extend the reach of Palestinian pleas for support and justice to most of the world Christians with a more resounding impact than Muslim could do on their own.

    We need to remember that Israel did not grow to be what it is today relying only on its own people and resources. Israel managed to play the religion and anti-Muslim card very well and capitalized on it in the media and in all its public relations campaigns over the years. Without Israel getting the undeserved sympathy of the Western world Christians, the playing field could have been more balanced for all Palestinians; Muslims and Christians.

    It is about time to realize that in this fight for justice we need all the allies we can get. Arab Christians have been much of a victim in this conflict as Arab Muslims have been. And they are an asset that Muslims should acknowledge and cherish.

    Khaled

    Coming next:
    The Forgotten Allies - Part 3: Arab Christians produce the best ‘Art of Return’.