tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4594177931877686122.post4769337156306127943..comments2023-03-25T08:41:12.279-05:00Comments on Khaled Hamid Forum: Slavery and Islam: A topic that should have been settled 1500 years ago, but it did notKhaledhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10331670117235466721noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4594177931877686122.post-54281868722195622732011-06-12T08:42:28.746-05:002011-06-12T08:42:28.746-05:00Hello Khalid,
I read this when you first posted, a...Hello Khalid,<br />I read this when you first posted, and decided not to comment because I wouldn’t be rational. Still until now I do not know how to deal with these ideas. I am not going to deal with slavery. You see, for the Salafi movement as I understand them there are gaps in history. Allow me to expand, the Salafis want to follow the teachings of the prophet (PBUH) and his companions, Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4594177931877686122.post-26108448161913115392011-06-09T10:51:42.262-05:002011-06-09T10:51:42.262-05:00Thanks for the comment. Would it be possible to p...Thanks for the comment. Would it be possible to post the name of the scholar and the publication?<br />khaledKhaledhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10331670117235466721noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4594177931877686122.post-45507926079296097722011-06-09T10:42:45.422-05:002011-06-09T10:42:45.422-05:00I agree with you. In the Qu'an there is no men...I agree with you. In the Qu'an there is no mention of Jariya or Jawari. There is the mention of "ma malakat aymanuhum." Despite the abundance of views to the contrary in the classical/neo-classical books of fiqh, "ma malakat aymanukum/hum" does not necessarily mean concubine. On the contrary, it could mean what you have entitled to--by marriage. One of the Ma malakat Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com